"Repressed Memory" Makes No Sense.

Authors

De Brigard, F

Abstract

The expression "repressed memory" was introduced over 100 years ago as a theoretical term purportedly referring to an unobservable psychological entity postulated by Freud's seduction theory. That theory, however, and its hypothesized cognitive architecture, have been thoroughly debunked-yet the term "repressed memory" seems to remain. In this paper, I offer a philosophical evaluation of the meaning of this theoretical term as well as an argument to question its scientific status by comparing it to other cases of theoretical terms that have either survived scientific change-such as "atom" or "gene"-or that have perished, such as "black bile." Ultimately, I argue that "repressed memory" is more like "black bile" than "atom" or "gene" and, thus, recommend its demotion from our scientific vocabulary.

Citation

De Brigard, F. (2024). "Repressed Memory" Makes No Sense. Topics in Cognitive Science, 16(4), 616–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12677

Publication Links